tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1785553332006919346.post6010311039018886972..comments2023-09-18T05:49:51.605-05:00Comments on Travis County Email Retention: A refinement to our approach is suggestedShawn Malonehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03669432032430269127noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1785553332006919346.post-32045063083791030532011-04-21T05:30:23.849-05:002011-04-21T05:30:23.849-05:00Earlier it was not easy to manage the records as t...Earlier it was not easy to manage the records as they were done manually. Bugs do exists when they are recorded manually so are chances of duplicate records too. The solution suggested for the above problem is accurate. I do agree with that fully.healthcare records managementhttp://www.grmdocumentmanagement.com/solutions/healthcare/records-managementnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1785553332006919346.post-3464912290220075232009-02-04T13:03:00.000-06:002009-02-04T13:03:00.000-06:00At Pierce County we're looking at the same issue -...At Pierce County we're looking at the same issue -3,500 people who've used Groupwise for years - but from a different driver - replacing Groupwise with Exchange for ease in support and maintenance - and with that change in technology and migration of email records (including discussions about calenders and contact lists). <BR/>Migrating records are causing the discussion around retention policies and records management - but classification problems (who, what and for how long) aren't solved by technology.<BR/>I've wondered about tagging - if making it easy for users to tag email, and being able to see and leverage how others have tagged email could help us develop record schedules for email that make sence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com